(PC)Ruiz v. Stane et al
| Rogelio May Ruiz |
| M. Stane, M. Espinoza, E. Ruelas, D. Chavez and D. Rowland |
| 1:2022cv00236 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
TEXT ONLY ORDER WITHDRAWING (Doc. No. #9 ) Findings and Recommendations in light of Amended Findings and Recommendations (Doc. No. #10 ). signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 4/17/2022. (Barch-Kuchta, Helena)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Case be Dismissed Without Prejudice; ORDER to Assign a District Judge, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 04/14/2022. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen-Days. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Findings and Recommendations served on Rogelio May Ruiz. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Case be Dismissed Without Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 4/12/2022 Objections to F&R due within FOURTEEN DAYS. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Findings and Recommendations (Motion) served on Rogelio May Ruiz. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. The new case number is: 1:22-cv-236 DAD-HBK. (Flores, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Rogelio May Ruiz. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 02/28/2022. Motion for IFP due within Thirty-Days. (Attachments: #1 Application for IFP Form)(Flores, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Rogelio May Ruiz. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 5
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:22-cv-0336 KJN) to Fresno (1:22-cv-00236 HMB) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/25/2022. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider and #4 Order served on Rogelio May Ruiz. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/28/2022 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Rogelio May Ruiz. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for APPOINTMENT of COUNSEL and MOTION for an interpreter by Rogelio May Ruiz (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against D. Chavez, M. Espinoza, D. Rowland, E. Ruelas, M. Stane by Rogelio May Ruiz.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
