Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC)Ruiz v. Stane et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
M. Stane, M. Espinoza, E. Ruelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Ruiz v. Stane et al
as 1:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
M. Stane, M. Espinoza, E. Ruelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Harmon et al
as 2:2020cv00721
Plaintiff:
Sedric Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
C. White, J. Ayon, J. Cluster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Combs v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2019cv00390
Defendant:
J. Ronquillo, L. Moore, C. Brubaker and others
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Wilson Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DaShawn Wilson Combs v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
as 2:2019cv01392
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Wilson Combs
Defendant:
Mr. L. Moore, Ms. R. Perez, Kern Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fidel Ruelas v. USA
as 09-4016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIDEL E. RUELAS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ruelas v. United States Of America
as 3:2009cv01222
Plaintiff:
Fidel E Ruelas
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ramon Del Rio v. Crawford et al
as 5:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ramon Del Rio
Defendant:
Crawford, Fugate, E Ruelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Del Rio v. Crawford et al
as 3:2009cv00137
Plaintiff:
Ramon Del Rio
Defendant:
Crawford, Fugate, E Ruelas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eugene Hamilton v. J. Harris, et al
as 08-57071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE HAMILTON
Defendant:
J. A. HARRIS, Associate Warden, individual and official capacities, G. STANLEY, Education Principal, individual and official capacities, J. LEWIS, Educational Vice Principal, individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
