(PC) Lewis v. Baker et al
| Derrick Jerome Lewis |
| Fredrick Baker, Chengdu Vantron Technologies Company Ltd., Child Protective Services, Damadu Games, Viapath Technologies, Touchpay Holdings LLC, James P. Womack, Lean Enterprise Institute, The Joint Commission and Institute for Healthcare Improvement |
| 1:2023cv01416 |
| September 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 09/28/2023. Case Number 2:23-cv-2144 KJN. Old Case Number 1:23-cv-1416.(Flores, E)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Derrick Jerome Lewis. (Xiong, J.) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/28/2023) (Xiong, J.). |
| Filing 1 (1983)PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Fredrick Baker, Chengdu Vantron Technologies Company Ltd., Child Protective Services, Damadu Games, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Lean Enterprise Institute, The Joint Commission, Touchpay Holdings LLC, Viapath Technologies, James P. Womack by Derrick Jerome Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Xiong, J.) (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/28/2023) (Xiong, J.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
