Cases 1 - 10 of 19
SHIN v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION A/K/A VIAPATH TECHNOLOGIES
as 5:2024cv00473
Defendant:
Global Tel*link Corporation and ViaPath Technologies (ViaPath)
Plaintiff:
DON SHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Davis v. ViaPath Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
ViaPath Technologies, Olan Owolabi, Warden Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Metcalf v. Viapath Technologies Touchpaz Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Denzell Metcalf
Defendant:
Viapath Technologies Touchpaz Holdings, LLC and Global Tel Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams et al
as 4:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams and Global Tel*Link Corporation d/b/a ViaPath Technologies
Cullen v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Jenzen Cullen
Defendant:
Warden William Hyatte, JOHN DOES 1-50, ViaPath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Baker et al
as 1:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Lewis
Defendant:
Fredrick Baker, Chengdu Vantron Technologies Company Ltd., Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
