(PC) Gomez v. Gonzalez et al
Plaintiff: Andy Mares Gomez
Defendant: Charles and Gonzalez
Case Number: 1:2023cv01442
Filed: October 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: No District Court Judge
Referring Judge: Ana de Alba
2 Judge: Barbara A McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the elevation of U.S. District Judge Ana I. de Alba to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the court finds it necessary to temporarily reassign this case to No District Court Judge (NODJ) until a new district judge is appointed. (Sant Agata, S)
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to dismiss action as duplicative #1 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/7/2023. Referred to Judge Ana de Alba; Objections to F&R due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should not be Dismissed as Duplicative signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/12/2023. Show Cause Response due within 21 days. (Xiong, J.)
October 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REQUEST for Screening Order Under 28 U.S.C. 1915a and for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Responsive Pleading by Charles, Gonzalez re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Charles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Faulconer, John)
October 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STIPULATION re #1 Notice of Removal, Parties' Stipulation to Remove Action by Charles, Gonzalez. (Faulconer, John)
October 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/10/2024 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Flores, E)
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Kern County Superior Court, case number BCV-23-100751 by R. Charles, E. Gonzalez. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11116774) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Faulconer, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Gomez v. Gonzalez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andy Mares Gomez
Represented By: Federico C. Sayre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles
Represented By: John William Faulconer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gonzalez
Represented By: John William Faulconer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?