Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv04620
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Black v. United States of America
as 3:2026cv06344
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01982
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. International Programs Group
as 5:2026cv02211
Defendant:
International Programs Group
Plaintiff:
Charles Calvin Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Goodrich
as 5:2026cv02270
Garnishee:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. / TD Ameritrade Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Scott Goodrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv27815
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06273
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-7175
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Margaret Byers v. Gordon Painter
as 26-2599
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, JOHN/JANE DOE SECURITY GUARDS (1-5), DAVID R. HYDE, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BYERS, Co-administrator of the Estate of Charles M. Byers, Deceased and MARGARET P. BYERS, Co-administrator of the Estate of Charles M. Byers, Deceased
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
