Albaseer et al v. USCIS California Service Center et al
| Abeer Abdulla Albaseer and Ghaleb Mohamed Alarifi |
| USCIS California Service Center, Pam Bondi, Kristi Noem and Kika Scott |
| 1:2025cv00425 |
| April 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Kirk E Sherriff |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/7/2025 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 VDRP, #2 CDB Worksheet, #3 Standing Order, #4 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Pam Bondi, Kristi Noem, Kika Scott, USCIS California Service Center* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Ines Ati* *42 West Street* *Suite 136* *Brooklyn, NY 11222*. (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Petition for Writ of Mandamus against Pam Bondi, Kristi Noem, Kika Scott, USCIS California Service Center by Abeer Abdulla Albaseer, Ghaleb Mohamed Alarifi. Attorney Ati, Ines added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-12155034) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ati, Ines) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
