Smith v. Hernandez et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Lawrence Smith
Defendant: Thompson, -, Gordon, Sawyer, Figeroe, Robertson, - Savage, - Hernandez, K Holmes and P. Cochrane
Case Number: 2:2007cv00837
Filed: May 2, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/3/10 ORDERING the Findings and Registrations 58 are ADOPTED; dfts' motion for summary judgment 56 GRANTED; and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close case. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
July 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/29/2010 that dfts' unopposed 56 motion for summary judgment be granted and all other pending motions be denied as moot. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
August 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/18/09 ordering on proper notice, defendants may schedule plaintiff's deposition to be taken on or before 10/16/09; As to all other discovery, the court's prior scheduling order remains in effect. ( Dispositive Motions due on or before 12/15/2009). (Plummer, M)
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/20/09 ORDERING that 47 MOTION for support from courts is DENIED.(Dillon, M)
February 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/17/09 ordering ( Discovery due by 8/17/2009.) All dispositive motions shall be filed within 60 days after the discovery cut-off date. (See order for further details). (Plummer, M)
January 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/14/09 ordering defendants shall file a response to the second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. The clerk of the court shll serve a copy of plaintiff's second amended complaint on defendant with a copy of this order. (Plummer, M)
May 10, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/9/07 GRANTING Pltf's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP 2. Pltf to pay $350 filing fee. No initial partial filing fee will be assessed. (Engbretson, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Hernandez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thompson, -
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sawyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Figeroe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: - Savage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: - Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P. Cochrane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Lawrence Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?