Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robertson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv00411
Plaintiff:
Marcus Robertson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Robertson v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00570
Petitioner:
Shelitha Robertson
Respondent:
Warden M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In re: Nicholas Purpura
as 26-3260
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS E. PURPURA
Respondent:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, & CO., JAMES DIMON, DEAN COOPER and others
Olivieri v. Robertson et al
as 1:2026cv04240
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Olivieri
Defendant:
Alton Robertson and Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 (i)(3) Breach of Insurance Contract
W S v. Wood et al
as 1:2026cv03454
Plaintiff:
W.S.
Defendant:
Mark Wood, Rapides Parish Police Jury, Jay Slayter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.D. v. Wood et al
as 1:2026cv03455
Plaintiff:
C.D.
Defendant:
Mark Wood, Rapides Parish Police Jury, Jay Slayter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robertson v. Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines
as 1:2026cv26154
Plaintiff:
Rodney Robertson
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Robertson v. LPS Services, Inc. d/b/a Reimagined Parking et al
as 0:2026cv03925
Plaintiff:
Melanie Robertson
Defendant:
LPS Services, Inc. d/b/a Reimagined Parking and Lanier Parking Services LLC d/b/a Reimagined Parking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
