Denham v. Sisto et al
Joe Denham |
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General CA |
2:2007cv00968 |
May 23, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Craig M. Kellison |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 03/09/11. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Court of Appeals. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 12/17/2010 ORDERING w/in 28 days of the service of this Order: 1. Respondent must advise this Court of (a) the date of Denhams last parole-suitability hearing before the Board of Parole Hearings, (b) the decision made by the Board at that hearing, and (c) the current status of any proceedings in the California state courts relating to the Board's decision; and 2. If a hearing has been held, w/in said 28 days, both Denham and Respondent must file briefs, not to exceed 10 pages in length, addressing the issue of whether Denham's Petition should be dismissed as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, w/in 21 days of the date the brief is filed as provided in the preceding paragraph, the other party may file a reply, not to exceed five pages in length.(Matson, R) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/9/07 ORDERING that the judgment entered on 9/26/07 is VACATED. This case is REOPENED. The Findings and Recommendations 4 and the Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations {6} are VACATED; and this matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistraate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/5/07. Petitioner shall submit, with 30 days from date of Order, a complete Application for Leave to Proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. Clerk directed to send petitioner a new Application to Proceed IFP form.(Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.