Socorro v. State of California et al
Roberto Socorro |
State of California, D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Sequira, Ferguson, E. Major, Garnica, Lane, Arthur, Traquina, Noriega, Tan and Hsieh |
2:2007cv01313 |
July 3, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/1/08 ORDERING that 13 Findings and Recommendations be vacated. It is hereby recommended that plaintiff's amended complaint be dismissed, his motion for a TRO/preliminary injunctive relief be denied and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections to F&R due within 20 days. (Anderson, J) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/12/07. Plaintiff's 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction is VACATED w/out prejudice to plaintiff's his filing an adequately supported Motion. Plaintiff shall submit, w/in 30 days from date of Order, a completed Affidavit in support of Request to Proceed IFP on form provided. Clerk directed to send a new Application to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall submit, w/in 30 days from date of Order, a certified copy of prison trust account for 6 months immediately preceding filing of Complaint. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.