Bertagna v. Sisto
David Bertagna |
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General for the State of California |
2:2008cv00049 |
January 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Craig M. Kellison |
Ronald S.W. Lew |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/28/10 re 17 ORDERING this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D) |
Filing 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/21/10 recommending that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be granted and that petitioner be released from custody unless a new parole suitability hearing is held within 45 days of entry of final judgment. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/14/2008 ORDERING Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's petition w/in 30 days from the date of service of this order; Petitioner's traverse or reply, if any, or opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served w/in 30 days of service of respondents' response; and The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, together with a copy of petitioner's petition for a writ of HC on DAG/Michael P. Farrell. (Attachments: # 1 Petition# 2 Points and Authorities # 3 Exhibit)(Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.