Law v. Aruther, et al
Plaintiff: Carlos Gilbert Law
Defendant: Sandi Witson, Henderson, Jones, Fowler, Cono, Aruther and Noriega
Case Number: 2:2008cv00291
Filed: February 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 126 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/18/12 RECOMMENDING that Defendants August 14, 2012 motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies 125 be granted; All outstanding motions be denied; This action be dismissed without prejudice; and the Clerk be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/10/2012, ORDERING that the 121 findings and recommendations are VACATED; defendants' 106 motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice; within 30 days, defendants may re-file and re-ser ve their motion to dismiss, along with the Wyatt Notice; if defendants re-serve their motion, plaintiff may file and serve an amended opposition within 30 days, thereafter; if plaintiff amends the opposition, defendants amended reply due within 14 days thereafter. (Yin, K)
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 121 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/26/2012 RECOMMENDING that the 106 Motion to Dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be granted, that all outstanding motions be denied as moot, that this action be dismissed without prejudice, and that the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Michel, G)
December 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/20/11 striking 104 Motion for production and the clerk shall make a notation on the docket to that effect. (Plummer, M)
December 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/20/11 granting 107 Motion to Stay. Discovery and filing of opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment shall be stayed until after issuance of a decision on defendants' motion to dismiss. (Plummer, M)
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/10/11: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 1, 2011, are adopted in full 69 ; and 2. Defendants November 10, 2010 motion to revoke plaintiffs in forma pauperis status and dismiss this action is denied. (Matson, R)
November 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/8/11 DENYING 88 Motion ; DENYING 89 Motion ; DENYING 97 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
September 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/1/2011 ORDERING that the Clerk terminate docket entry 83 ; RECOMMENDING 69 that motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and dismiss this action, be denied; Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
February 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/10/11 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to defendants' motion or a statement of no opposition. (Plummer, M)
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/7/11 ORDERING that within twenty-one days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to defendants motion or a statement of no opposition.(Dillon, M)
November 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/16/10 ORDERING dfts Noriega and Lambert's Motion to file under seal documents containing plaintiffs photographs, date of birth, social security number and fingerprints, attached as Exhibit B, Bates number 4 to 13, and Exhibit C, Bates number 14 to 26 GRANTED.(Carlos, K)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/22/10 granting 60 Motion for the local rules. The clerk of the court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court. (Plummer, M)
February 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms signed by District Judge Samuel P. King on 2/23/2010. Service is appropriate for defendants RN Lambert and Dr. Noriega. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 2 USM-285 forms, and a copy of Second Amended Complaint filed on 12/30/2009. Defendant's 50 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Sgt. Whitson is TERMINATED as a party. (Marciel, M)
December 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by District Judge Samuel P. King on 12/14/2009 ORDERING 30 Amended Complaint is dismissed w/leave to file an amended complaint w/in 30 days. If no further amended complaint is filed w/in 30 days, the action will be closed and judgment entered against pltf.(Matson, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Law v. Aruther, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandi Witson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Henderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cono
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aruther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noriega
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Gilbert Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?