Neal v. Campbell et al
Sean Baptisee Neal |
Roseanne Campbell, White and M Cherry |
2:2008cv00313 |
February 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Garland E. Burrell |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 07/21/10 ORDERING defendants' motion for a protective order sealing exhibit and for in camera review 57 is granted. The clerk of court is directed to sca n the documents provided by defendants as Attachment 2 to exhibit A and to file the scanned copy under seal, returning the original paper documents to defendants' counsel. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion for summary judgment 55 be granted. This case be closed. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 55 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M) |
Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/1/2010 ORDERING that dfts' 68 request for an extension of time to reply to pltf's opposition to motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, dfts reply due w/in 14 days; pltf's mot ions for 58 notice of default, 61 entry of default, 59 subpoena, 60 , 64 continuance to collect affidavits; 62 , 65 , 71 the appoinment of expert witness; and motions brought under F.R.Civ.P. 56(f) are DENIED; pltf to REFRAIN from filing any further documents until dfts' motion for summary judgment is resolved, unless he first seek advance permission from the court. (Yin, K) |
Filing 54 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 01/07/10 ordering that plaintiff's 12/28/09 request for issuance of a subpoena 53 is denied without prejudice to renewal at a time when plaintiff can and does establish need for issuance of the subpoena. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/10/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel 50 is DENIED; and Plaintiff's motion for the issuance of a subpoena 51 is DENIED. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/19/09 granting in part and denying in part 39 plaintiff's Motion to compel. (See order for details). Any motions for summary judgment shall be filed within 60 days. An opposition to a summary judgment motion shall be filed within 30 days of service of the motion and a reply shall be filed within 15 days of service of the opposition. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/19/09 ORDERING that 45 Supplement to Amended Complaint be DISREGARDED and placed in the court's file. (Owen, K) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/17/09 ORDERING that defendants have 36 moved for an extension of time to move for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, the court will set a deadline for defendants to file their motion for summary judgment after the court rules on plaintiffs amended motion to compel. (Gaydosh, J) |
Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/14/09 ordering plaintiff's 01/20/09 motion to compel 27 is denied without prejudice to plaintiff filing an amended motion to compel within 30 days. Plaintiff's 02/09/09 request for an extension of time to conduct discovery 30 , except to the extent described above, is denied. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/28/09 DENYING 26 Request for extension of time.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.