Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Dubar v. Brody et al
as 7:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Marian Elizabeth Dubar a woman d/b/a Marian Eliabeth Dubar Estate Living 28 Trust
Defendant:
Tao Brody d/b/a Leland One LLC, Edward M. Cherry d/b/a FCA Managemnt LLC, Emily Wingfield d/b/a Loebsack & Brownle, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHERRY v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv07411
Petitioner:
JOSEPH M. CHERRY
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cherry v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00194
Defendant:
Joseph M. Cherry, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cherry v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Joseph M. Cherry, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CHERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13127
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M CHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Lemmon et al
as 5:2020ct03009
Defendant:
Steve B. Wright, Edwin L. West, III, Preston Nowell and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Leon Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv03188
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Starlla M. Cherry and Starlla M Cherry
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Search et al v. Material Transport LLC
as 4:2018cv01941
Defendant:
Material Transport LLC and Kimberly M Cherry
Plaintiff:
Robert Rose and Frank Search
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roy Daniels v. Warden, et al
as 17-13689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY O. DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, WARDEN, S. M. CHERRY, Officer and others
Roy Daniels v. Warden, et al
as 17-11366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY O. DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, S. M. CHERRY, Officer, W. ONEIL SHEPPARD, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
