Overton v. Bachlor et al
| Michael Louis Overton |
| Peggy Bachlor, Arthur Anderson and Sandra Bryson |
| 2:2008cv01128 |
| May 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Solano |
| Morrison C. England |
| John F. Moulds |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/10/11 ordering that petitioner's 09/28/11 motion 25 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
22
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/4/09 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's third amended application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/21/09 ORDERING that Petitioners second amended petition is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Within 30 days, petitioner shall complete the attached Notice of Amendment and submit the appropriate documents to the court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the courts form for application for writ of habeas corpus.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING in full 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/20/09. Petitioner's 12/8/08 motion to set bail is DENIED without prejudice.(Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
