Cases 1 - 10 of 14
David Curtis v. Kathleen Dickinson, et al
as 12-55374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT CURTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden of California Medical Facility, official capacity, ROBERT DOYLE, Chairperson, Board of Parole Hearings, official capacity, SANDRA BRYSON, Commissioner, Board of Parole Hearings, official capacity and others
Steven Hypolite v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 11-17964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN HYPOLITE
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, SANDRA BRYSON and ROBERT HARMON
David Scott Curtis v. Kathleen Dickinson et al
as 5:2011cv01856
Defendant:
Jocelynn Arceo, Board of Parole Hearings, Sandra Bryson and others
Plaintiff:
David Scott Curtis
Steven Hypolite v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 11-17141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN HYPOLITE
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, SANDRA BRYSON and ROBERT HARMON
Mack Shorty v. D.K. Sisto, et al
as 11-16627
Petitioner - Appellant:
MACK NELSON SHORTY
Respondent - Appellee:
D.K. SISTO, SANDRA BRYSON, CHUCK WOLK and others
Hypolite v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 2:2011cv00990
Plaintiff:
Steven Hypolite
Defendant:
Board of Parole Hearings, Sandra Bryson and Robert Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Bryson, et al
as 2:2010cv01915
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Reece
Defendant:
Sandra Bryson and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khalifah Saif"Ullah v. Jatinder Singh, et al
as 10-15630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALIFAH E.D. SAIF"ULLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
JATINDER SINGH, STEVEN WALKER, MIKE PRIZMICH and others
Dehuma v. Sisto et al
as 2:2009cv01230
Petitioner:
Juan Dehuma
Respondent:
Dennis Kris Sisto, John W Haviland, Sandra Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maimona v. Board of Prison Terms et al
as 3:2009cv00264
Petitioner:
Daniel Maimona
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms, Elizabeth Richardson and Sandra Bryson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
