Thoms v. Walgreen Co.

Thoms v. Walgreen Co.

Plaintiff:	Nathan Thoms
Defendant:	Walgreen Co.
Case Number:	2:2008cv01649
Filed:	July 17, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Consumer Credit Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge:	John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 8, 2009	Filing 53 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff entered pursuant to Order entered on 4/8/2009 and signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/8/2009. (Gaydosh, J)
February 3, 2009	Filing 38 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/2/09 ORDERING the following scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED: to complete class discovery and file class certification motion by 2/10/09, dft to complete class discovery and file any class certificat ion opposition by 3/3/09, pltf to file any class certification reply by 3/13/09 and the hearing on motion for class certification of 4/8/09 at 9:00 AM; these dates are subject to being re-set as appropriate by the Court, following rulings on Walgreen's motion for summary judgment 32 and motion for protective order.(Carlos, K)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 8, 2009

Filing 53 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff entered pursuant to Order entered on 4/8/2009 and signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/8/2009. (Gaydosh, J)

February 3, 2009

Filing 38 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/2/09 ORDERING the following scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED: to complete class discovery and file class certification motion by 2/10/09, dft to complete class discovery and file any class certificat ion opposition by 3/3/09, pltf to file any class certification reply by 3/13/09 and the hearing on motion for class certification of 4/8/09 at 9:00 AM; these dates are subject to being re-set as appropriate by the Court, following rulings on Walgreen's motion for summary judgment 32 and motion for protective order.(Carlos, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thoms v. Walgreen Co.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Thoms
Represented By:	Gene Joseph Stonebarger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Represented By:	Jason David Strabo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?