Vaughan et al v. County of Placer et al
| Jeanne Vaughan, John Vaughan, Walter Vaughan, Abigail Vaughan and Peter Vaughan |
| County of Placer, Edward N Bonner, Barnhart, Scott, Minton-Sander, Vivian Vasquez and Lobb |
| 2:2008cv02041 |
| August 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 09/17/10 ORDERING that the 09/20/10 status conference is VACATED and plaintiff is to notify the court at the conclusion of the criminal proceeding, at which time a status conference will be scheduled. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/14/2010 RESCHEDULING the Status Conference for 5/3/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Litigation of this case is stayed pending final judgment in a related state criminal proceeding; these criminal proceedings are ongoing. (Suttles, J)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/20/2009 ORDERING Status Conference RESET for 1/19/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
