Cases 1 - 10 of 87,065
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ulloa v. Cruger Management LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02120
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ulloa
Defendant:
Cruger Management LLC and Scott Schuster
Caitlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Scott Caitlin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brandon et al v. USIC Locating Services, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Clifford Brandon, Raymond O'Donnell and Scott Nerge
Defendant:
USIC Locating Services, LLC, USIC, LLC, Reconn Holdings, LLC and others
Orange County Coastkeeper v. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 8:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Orange County Coastkeeper
Defendant:
Army Corps of Engineers and Scott A. Spellmon
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
REIGLE, II v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06334
Plaintiff:
SCOTT REIGLE, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. Ascend Loans, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01722
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hall
Defendant:
Ascend Loans, LLC, Uprova Holdings LLC, Upper Lake Processing Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Bunts et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. et al
as 1:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Michael Bunts, Janet Bunts, Lillian R. Bunts and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Norfolk Southern Corp., John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
