Cases 1 - 10 of 8,439
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calisi v. D'ESPOSITO
as 6:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Calisi
Defendant:
SCOTT D'ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 Civil Action to Restrain Harassment of a Victim or Witness
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Calisi v. COUNTY OF VOLUSIA et al
as 6:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Calisi
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VOLUSIA and SCOTT D'ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Daiagi v. Granocean LTD et al
as 0:2024cv60617
Plaintiff:
Scott Daiagi
Defendant:
Granocean, Carbay.Net PTY Ltd., Mark Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Simpkins v. FNU Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCathertan, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chestnut v. Durborow et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Gernard Denez Chestnut
Defendant:
Scott W. Durborow and Tyler Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKS v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
SCOTT HICKS
Respondent:
RICKEY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez et al v. The Scotts Company, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60516
Plaintiff:
Amanda Perez and Michael Gregorio
Defendant:
The Scotts Company, LLC and Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
