Williams v. Tate et al
Kirk Douglas Williams |
Matthew Tate and Tom Felker |
2:2008cv02242 |
September 24, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas on 5/12/2010 GRANTING 42 Motion to Dismiss. All pending motions are denied. CASE CLOSED. (Engbretson, K.) |
Filing 39 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas on 10/02/09 ORDERING that this court has received plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, 9/17/09.That motion 36 is DENIED. Plaintiff alleges that prison officials violated his Eighth Amendment right s by altering his classification without 72 hours advance notice. However, "misclassification does not itself inflict pain within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment." Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237,1256 (9th Cir. 1982) (citations omitted). (Becknal, R) |
Filing 34 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas on 8/18/2009 DENYING 32 Paaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration; GRANTING 33 Motion for Extension of time to complete Notice of Submission of Documents filed by plaintiff Kirk Douglas Williams; Plaintiff shall have until 9/4/2009 to file the required documents. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff 7 additional USM-285 forms. (Reader, L) |
Filing 31 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms signed by Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas on 7/22/09. Service is appropriate for State of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cate, Ken Clark, L. Polk, P. Medved, B. Hall, L. Lima. Clerk to send plaintiff: one Summons, 8 USM-285 Forms, and one copies of the Amended Complaint filed on 4/24/09. Case Management Deadline: 8/25/2009. (Duong, D) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas on 03/31/09 ORDERING that plf's 24 Request for an extension of time to file an amended complaint is DENIED. The court's 25 03/19/09 Order granting plf until 04/23/09 to file an amended complaint remains in effect. Failure to file an amended complaint by that date will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas on 1/30/09 ORDERING this action is dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the date of this order. Any amended complaint must clearly articulate an actual injury caused by the HDSP law librarys alleged deficiencies. Failure to file a second amended complaint by the deadline will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice.(Carlos, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.