Cases 1 - 10 of 13
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74659
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06626
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Tate et al v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv03079
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tate and Stacy Tate
Defendant:
United States of America
Tate v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00739
Plaintiff:
Alvin Matthew Tate
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Samuel Anderson v. USDC-SAC
as 13-73444
:
In re: SAMUEL ANDERSON
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
MATTHEW TATE, M. D. MCDONALD, R. L. GOWER and others
Samuel Anderson v. Matthew Tate et al
as 2:2012cv10690
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anderson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Cate, Dr. Hernandez and others
Samuel Anderson v. Tate et al
as 1:2012cv01987
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anderson
Defendant:
Matthew Tate, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. City of Dallas, TX et al
as 3:2012cv02594
Plaintiff:
Jaqueline Collins
Defendant:
City of Dallas, TX, Chief David Brown and Matthew Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2012cv02584
Defendant:
City of Dallas , Chief David Brown and Matthew Tate
Plaintiff:
Jaqueline Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samuel Anderson v. Matthew Tate, et al
as 11-16376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW TATE, M. D. MCDONALD, R. L. GOWER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
