Johnson v. Sisto

Johnson v. Sisto

Petitioner:	David Wayne Johnson
Respondent:	D. K. Sisto
Case Number:	2:2008cv02392
Filed:	October 9, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge:	Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 3, 2011	Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/3/11 ORDERING that the parties have 21 days to provide simultaneous briefing, demonstrating why the instant petition should not be dismissed.(Dillon, M)
January 13, 2009	Filing 15 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/12/09 ORDERING that the show cause order filed on 12/13/08 13 has been discharged by petitioner by his 12/31/08 14 statement of non-opposition. Also, RECO MMENDING that respondent's unopposed request for a stay, filed on 12/19/08 12 be granted, and this matter be administratively closed pending the en banc decision in Hayward v. Marshall. Motion 12 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 3, 2011

Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/3/11 ORDERING that the parties have 21 days to provide simultaneous briefing, demonstrating why the instant petition should not be dismissed.(Dillon, M)

January 13, 2009

Filing 15 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/12/09 ORDERING that the show cause order filed on 12/13/08 13 has been discharged by petitioner by his 12/31/08 14 statement of non-opposition. Also, RECO MMENDING that respondent's unopposed request for a stay, filed on 12/19/08 12 be granted, and this matter be administratively closed pending the en banc decision in Hayward v. Marshall. Motion 12 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Sisto
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: David Wayne Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?