Heilman v. Fry et al
| Thomas John Heilman |
| N. Fry, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Robert Horel, Traquino, Wiley, D.R. Johns, S. Olivio, M. Barnett, T. Freitas, Gonzalez and Quinarte |
| 2:2008cv02478 |
| October 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Solano |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Justin L. Quackenbush on 10/23/09 ORDERING plaintiff's motion 10 is GRANTED and the complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this order, enter judgment of dismissal of the complaint and the claims therein without prejudice, forward a copy to plaintiff and close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
9
SCREENING ORDER signed by Senior Judge Justin L. Quackenbush on 10/2/09 ORDERING that the complaint is DISMISSED. Pltf has until 11/3/09 to file an amended complaint. The Clerk to provide pltf w/a civil rights complaint form.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
8
FIRST INFORMATIONAL ORDER IN PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS CASE signed by Senior Judge Justin L. Quackenbush on 8/14/09: The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and provide a copy to Plaintiff. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
