Cases 1 - 10 of 38
(PC) Heilman v. Viss et al
as 1:2019cv01654
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman
Defendant:
R. Fisher, Santos, P. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Heilman v. D. McAlister, et al
as 19-56123
Defendant / Appellee:
R. OCHOA, Appeals Coordinator (CC-II), individual/official capacity, MELANIE MILLER, Superior Court Clerk, individual/official capacity, R. W. TOMPKINS, individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN
Heilman v. Viss et al
as 4:2019cv04581
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman
Defendant:
R. Fisher, Santos, P. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heilman v. Koenig et al
as 4:2019cv02607
Petitioner:
Thomas John Heilman
Respondent:
X. Becerra and C. Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heilman v. Koenig et al
as 3:2019cv00820
Petitioner:
Thomas John Heilman
Respondent:
X. Becerra and C. Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas John Heilman v. D. H. McAlister et al
as 2:2018cv06569
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman
Defendant:
Captain D. H. McAlister, R. Ochoa, X. Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Heilman v. R. Furster, et al
as 18-55893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
R. FURSTER, Facility Captain, in individual capacity, B. VILLA, Correctional Officer, in individual capacity, WARD, Correctional Sergeant, in individual capacity and others
Thomas Heilman v. USDC-SAC
as 17-73032
:
In re: THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN
Petitioner:
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
L. SANCHEZ
Thomas Heilman v. A. Whitten, et al
as 17-17089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
A. WHITTEN, Correctional Officer, M. DOOLEY, Sergeant and F. MENDOZA
Thomas John Heilman v. R. L. Furster et al
as 2:2015cv09987
Defendant:
R. L. Furster, M. Grijalva, J. Javaux and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
