Ingram v. Grant Joint Union High School District, et al
| Chaderick A. Ingram |
| M. Scott, C. Breck and Grant Joint Union High School District |
| 2:2008cv02490 |
| October 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Sacramento |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 07/20/2011. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/18/11 ORDERING the 5/20/11 status conference is dropped from the calendar and 83 Motion for Judgment is denied as moot. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
90
STIPULATION and ORDER 89 signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/3/11; The Status Conference is reset for 5/20/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/6/11 GRANTING 87 Motion to Appoint ad Litem; Lawrence Pernell is appointed as guardian ad litem of petitioner for the purpose of continuing the action against the remaining defendants on the claim. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/25/2011. Attorney Joanna R. Mendoza is APPOINTED as limited purpose counsel. Joanna R. Mendoza shall notify Sujean Park if she has any questions related to appointment. Unless Ms. Mendoza chooses to continue her pro bono representation of plaintiff, appointment will conclude after completion of 4/1/2011 Hearing on 83 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Clerk directed to serve a copy of Order upon Joanna R. Mendoza and on Assistant Federal Defender Lexi Negin. (cc: J. Mendoza and L. Negin) (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/11/11 ORDERING that Defendants' motion to amend pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure15(a)(2) 77 is granted, and defendants' First Amended 80 Answer has been filed; Defendants' motion to dismiss, motion for judgment on the pleadings, or other appropriate motion shall be filed on or before 3/14/11, and shall be noticed for hearing before the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 230. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 9/9/10 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 73 are adopted in full; Defendants' 9/21/09 motion to strike portions of plaintiff's second amended complaint 54 is granted and the spec ified portions of the pleading are deemed stricken; Defendants' 9/21/09 motion to dismiss and for more definite statement 56 is(a) granted as to dismissal of all claims against Grant Joint Union High School District Police Services Division; ( b) granted as to dismissal of all claims alleged under the First, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments;(c) denied as to dismissal of the claims alleged against defendants Breck and Scott under the Fourth Amendment; (d) denied as to requiring a more definite statement; and Defendants' 9/21/09 motion for sanctions 58 is denied. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/13/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 11/23/09 MOTION for leave to file an interlocutory appeal 70 is DENIED. Plaintiff's 11/23/09 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 71 is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's 11/23/09 MOTION for transcripts at goverment expense 72 is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff at his address of record and also at th e following address: Chaderick A. Ingram, X- 3076322 Sacramento County Main Jail 651 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814. The Clerk is directed to send a courtesy copy of this order and Findings and Recommendatins to Lexi Negin, Assistant Federal Defender Office of the Federal Defender for the EDCA 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Defendants' 9/21/09 MOTION TO STRIKE portions of Plaintiff's second amended complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(f) 54 be granted a nd the specific portions of the pleading be deemed striken; Defendants' 9/21/09 MOTION to Dismiss and for more definite statement 56 be granted as to dismissal of all claims against Grant Joint Union High School District Police Services Divisi on; granted as to dismissal of all claims alleged under the First, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments; denied as to dismissal of the claims alleged against defendants Breck and Scott under the Fourth Amendment; denied as to requiring a more defi nite statement; These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to U.S. District Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any may file written objections with the Court. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/18/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 65 66 67 68 November 9, 2009 motions aredenied and will not be placed on the court's calendar for hearing. Plaintiff is prohibited from filing any motion or request of any kind in this action until the undersigned has issued findings and recommendations addressing defendants' submitted motions to dismiss, to strike, and for sanctions. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff's repeated violations of applicable rules and court orders. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/09 ORDERING pltf's 10/9/09 motion for summary judgment 61 is DENIED and the noticed date of 11/6/09 is VACATED; pltf is prohibited from filing in this action any further document seeking summary judgment or noticing a hearing on summary judgment until the court issues an order granting him leave to file such motion. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/10/09 GRANTING 17 Motion to Dismiss ; GRANTING 19 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a second amended complaint which shall be filed and served within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's notice of hearing on motion for summary judgment filed 8/28/09 will be disregarded and the noticed 10/2/09 hearing is VACATED. (Streeter, J)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/29/09 DISREGARDING documents 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 and 45 ; dfts are not required to respond to any motion or request filed by pltf absent a court order requiring a response. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/16/2009 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendant's 19 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and 17 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is RESET for 3/6/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Any party may appear at the hearing telephonically. Plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition to both motions shall be filed on or before 2/20/09; Defendants' reply to any opposition filed by the plaintiff shall be filed and served on or before 2/27/09. (Streeter, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
