Cases 1 - 10 of 442
Dejuan ScottIn re: Dejuan Scott
as 24-5889
Petitioner:
In re: DEJUAN M. SCOTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rowe v. Scott et al
as 1:2024cv01741
Defendant:
MTS Transport, LLC, MTS Express, LLC, Marino Transportation Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Connor Martin Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Scott v. M. Scotts Bakeries, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01213
Defendant:
M. Scotts Bakeries, Inc d/b/a Savages's Bakery and Edward Van Zile Scott, Jr
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Scott
as 1:2024cv07119
Defendant:
Thomas M Scott
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alaraidah v. Garg et al
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Musa Alaraidah
Defendant:
The Estate of Richard I. Eisenstadt, Diane K. Jorkasky, M. Scott Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Campanile v. Altimmune, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01918
Defendant:
Altimmune, Inc., Vipin K. Garg, Richard I. Eisenstadt and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Campanile
Petitioner:
Bhupendra K. Shah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kleinjans v. Korpak et al
as 1:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Christian Kleinjans
Defendant:
M. Scott Korpak, Matthew Shane and Erin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
In Re Altimmune, Inc., Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2024cv00669
Defendant:
Diane K. Jorkasky, Altimmune, Inc., Richard I. Eisenstadt and others
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC and Musa Alaraidah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Mogan v. Altimmune, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01315
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mogan
Defendant:
Altimmune, Inc., Vipin K. Garg, Richard I. Eisenstadt and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
