Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Scott v. Hattiesburg Police Department
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sam M. Scott
Defendant:
Hattiesburg Police Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donny M. Scott
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. The State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Donny M. Scott
Defendant:
The State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hibbler v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Eric Hibbler
Defendant:
Timothy M. Scott, UPS Ground Freight and Liberty Mutual Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Conley v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Shmicheal Conley
Defendant:
Timothy M. Scott, TForce Freight, Inc., UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones et al v. Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Latoya Jones , Olivia M. Scott and Tammy Jordan
Defendant:
Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc. and John Does I through X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Casey v. Scott et al
as 5:2010cv00064
Plaintiff:
Vonzell Casey
Defendant:
M. Scott, Bruce Pearson, Unknown McGregar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. Scott et al
as 5:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ernest Marshall
Defendant:
M. Scott, Bruce Pearson, Unknown McGregar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall et al v. Scott et al
as 5:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Ernest Marshall and Vonzell Casey
Defendant:
M. Scott, Bruce Pearson, Unknown McGregar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
