Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01043
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Ebony M. Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. Parker
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Branden M. Scott
Defendant:
Ashley Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zelesnik v. Kentucky et al
as 2:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Kentucky, Ky Senator Paul Rand, Tom T. Wallace and others
Drew Parsons v. City of Ann Arbor, MI, et al
as 22-1338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DREW PARSONS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MI, ANN ARBOR, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK PULFORD, JR., Sergeant and others
AssetMark Financial Holdings, Inc. et al v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
AssetMark Financial Holdings, Inc. and AssetMark, Inc.
Defendant:
Clark M. Scott, III, Hello Earth, LLC and Wyatt Online Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gemuenden v. Scott et al
as 5:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Joanna Kelley, Young Explorers Of Streetsboro, LLC, Barry Y Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Whitney Gemuenden
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Haynes v. The Kroger Co.
as 2:2021cv00544
Plaintiff:
M. Scott Haynes
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Oshinowo v. ASM Holdings LLC
as 2:2020cv11393
Defendant:
ASM Holdings LLC, Davena Knight, Rebecca Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Olusegun Oshinowo, Golden Castle LLC, Somewhere Out There LLC and others
Parsons v. Ann Arbor, City of et al
as 2:2020cv10486
Defendant:
Ann Arbor, City of, Sgt Mark Pulford, Jr, Ann Arbor Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Drew Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bowers et al
as 4:2019cv02198
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Johnson
Defendant:
Chief Bowers and M. Scott Criss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
