Jackson v. Sisto, et al
| Lamon E. Jackson |
| T Sequira, A. Jackson, D. K. Sisto, E Gums and M Fussotti |
| 2:2008cv02502 |
| October 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Solano |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/14/2010 RECOMMENDING that dfts' 22 , 23 motions to dismiss be granted. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/10/09 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/25/09 16 are ADOPTED in full; Defendant Jackson is DISMISSED from this action. This case will proceed on Plaintiff's first amended complaint against defendant Sisto, Gums and Fuizzotti only. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/20/09 DENYING 14 Motion to Proceed IFP as duplicative. Plaintiff will continue to be able to proceed in this case in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve * amended complaint * filed on * 05/27/09,* on * D. K. Sisto, T. Sequira, E Gums, M Fussotti*, signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 07/09/09. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
