Rose v. Sisto
Petitioner: Steven V Rose
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Case Number: 2:2008cv03012
Filed: December 11, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/82010 ORDERING 27 a Certificate of Appealability should not issue in this action. (Reader, L)
April 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING in full 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/8/10: The court's March 17, 2010 order is vacated, and judgment entered on March 17, 2010, is vacated. Respondent's March 27, 2009 motion to dismiss the pending habeas petition as unexhausted is granted. Petitioner's September 28, 2009 motion for declaratory and injunctive relief is denied. This action is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
February 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/11/10 recommending that 15 MOTION to DISMISS be granted; 18 MOTION for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief be denied; and this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/26/09 ORDERING that Petitioners 5 application to proceed IFP is GRANTED; Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioners habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and the courts form regarding consent or request for reassignment on Michael Patrick Farrell. Petitioner's 9 Request to expedite review and ruling is DENIED. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose v. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven V Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?