Gutierrez v. Sisto, et al
Petitioner: Heverd Gutierrez
Respondent: D. K. Sisto and California Board of Prison Hearings
Case Number: 2:2009cv00329
Filed: February 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/11 GRANTING 31 Motion to Proceed IFP on appeal. (Dillon, M)
May 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/31/11 GRANTING 29 motion for an enlargement of time filed by Heverd Gutierrez. Petitioner shall file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days from the date of this order. (Meuleman, A)
May 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/2011 ORDERING ptnr to submit, w/in 14 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the $455 appellate filing fee; and the clerk to send ptnr an ifp form.(Yin, K)
January 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 01/28/11 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
December 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/4/09 ORDERING that 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice, and, good cause appearing, petitioners 12/1/09 traverse is deemed timely filed.(Dillon, M)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/31/09 ORDERING respondent to file a response to the petition w/in 60 days; reply due w/in 30 days of answer; if response is a motion, opposition or statement of non-opposition due w/in 30 days o f motion, reply due w/in 15 days thereafter; the clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General; petitioner's 1/29/09 request for appointment of counsel is DENIED w/out prejudice.(cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gutierrez v. Sisto, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Heverd Gutierrez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: California Board of Prison Hearings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?