Walton v. Butler et al
| Ronald E. Walton |
| J Butler, L M Orum, D. K. Sisto, C. Orrick, S. Clarey, Sheal, E Rogers, Gullery and E Majors |
| 2:2009cv00479 |
| February 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/1/2011 recommending that 39 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by defendant's be granted; that the Clerk be directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant's; and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Motion referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Any party may file objections to the F&Rs w/i 14 days after being served.(Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/12/11 denying plaintiff's motions to compel 34 , 35 . (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/17/11 ORDERING that dft Orum shall pay to the USM the sum of $57.00 and dft Sisto shall to the USM $55.00; the Clerk shall serve the USM with this order. (cc: USM) (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/22/10 ordering within 14 days from the date of service of this order, defendant Orum shall pay to the U.S. Marshal the sum of $57.00, and defendant Sisto shall pay to the U.S. Marshal the sum of $55.00 unless within that time Orum or Sisto files a written statement showing good cause for failing to waive service. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/1/2010 DENYING pltf's 24 motion for appointment of counsel and 23 motion for reconsideration. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/5/10 ORDERING that 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED; 20 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED; The May 6, 2010 discovery and scheduling order is amended as follows: parties may conduct discovery until 11/15/10. Motions to amend the complaint shall be filed no later than 11/15/10. Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before 1/17/11. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/10 DIRECTING USM to serve Complaint filed on 2/18/09, on E Majors, J Butler, L M Orum, D. K. Sisto, C. Orrick, S. Clarey, Sheal, Gullery wiithin 14 days. Clerk of the Court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court. (cc USM)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/1/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 2 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED; pltf to pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action in accordance w/ the concurrent CDC order; claims against dft Roge rs are DISMISSED w/ leave to amend w/in 30 days, pltf is not obliged to amend his cmplt; service is appropriate for E Majors, J Butler, L M Orum, D. K. Sisto, C. Orrick, S. Clarey, Sheal and Gullery; the clerk to send pltf forms for svc to be completed and returned w/in 20 days w/ the Notice of Submission. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/20/09 ORDERING that upon reconsideration, the 9/23/09 order, is confirmed.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
