Muhammad v. Sisto et al
| Shaka Senegal Muhammad |
| D. K. Sisto, R. Hayward and T. Moore |
| 2:2009cv00582 |
| March 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/17/11 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a district judge to this action; RECOMMENDING that Plaintiffs 23 motion to withdraw h is complaint, and 24 motion to close this action, be granted; Defendants 18 motion to dismiss this action, and 20 motion to have plaintiff declared a vexatious litigant, be denied as moot; and this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/15/11: Defendants shall file, within seven days, a statement whether they would be prejudiced by dismissal of this action, and by the dismissal of defendants' pending motions as moot; any averment of prejudice must be specific to defendants herein and to this litigation. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/7/11 ORDERING that within 14 days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendants 18 motion to dismiss. Failure to file such opposition will be d eemed as plaintiffs consent to have the: (a) pending motion granted; (b) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (c) action dismissed based on plaintiffs failure to comply with these rules and a court order. In addition, plaintiff is hereby informed that the same principles will be applied to plaintiffs failure to timely respond to defendants 20 motion to have plaintiff declared a vexatious litigant, without further warning by this court.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/22/10 ORDERING that 5 and 6 Motions to Proceed IFP are GRANTED; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
