Walton v. Hixson, et al
| Ronald E. Walton |
| S. Hixson, Thomas, Sisto, Orric, E Rogers, S. Cervantes, Roland Soria, V. Hilsky, S. Prasad and J. Voight |
| 2:2009cv01246 |
| May 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/29/2011 RECOMMENDING that defendants' 37 motion to dismiss be granted; and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying 27 Motion to compel discovery responses signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/23/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 02/22/11 and ORDERING that dfts' 17 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: dfts' 17 Motion to Dismiss is GR ANTED insofar as the complaint can be read to allege that dft Hixson violated plf's rights by telling him to break up his prayers, by making it not possible for plf to engage in morning prayer on one occasion, by mishandling his grievance, by op ening his legal mail, by subjecting him to verbal harassment, and by preparing false rules violation reports and to the extent that plf alleges that the RVRS of 08/04/08 and 11/27/08 were retaliatory; but the Motion is DENIED to the extent the complaint can be read to allege that dft Hixson violated plf's First Amendment rights by undertaking a series of retaliatory acts, except as noted in paragraph one; and that dfts Hixson and Hilsky violated his Eighth Amendment rights. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/19/11 ORDERING that defendants' motion to strike 26 is granted and docket number 25 is stricken from the record. Also, RECOMMENDING defendants' motion to dismiss 17 is granted insofar as the complaint can be read to allege that defendant Hixson violated plaintiff's rights by telling him to break up his prayers, by making it not possible for plaintiff to engage in morning prayer on 1 o ccasion, by mishandling his grievance, by opening his legal mail, by subjecting him to verbal harassment, and by preparing false rules violation reports and to the extent that plaintiff alleges that the RVRS of August 4 and November 27, 2008 were ret aliatory; but the motion is denied to the extent the complaint can be read to allege that defendant Hixson violated his First Amendment rights by undertaking a series of retaliatory acts except as noted in paragraph one; and that defendants Hixson and Hilsky violated his 8th amendment rights. Motion to Dismiss 17 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/03/10 denying 21 motion for return of legal property. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve * Complaint * filed on *5/6/09* on * S. Hixson, V. Hilsky*, signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/2/09: The Clerk of the Court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of Local Rules of Court. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Ronald E. Walton signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/08/09. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP application 2 on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
