Sultan et al v. Roark et al
| Muhammad Sultan, Sarwat Sultan and Madeeha Sultan |
| David Roark, Gerard Heinauer, Michael Aytes, Janet Napolitano, Robert S. Mueller and Eric H. Holder, Jr. |
| 2:2009cv02158 |
| August 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/25/2010. Status Conference is RE-SCHEDULED for 8/9/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Joint status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to Conference date. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/15/09 ORDERING that the time for the government to answer the complaint is extended to January 15, 2010. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 10/21/2009 ORDERING 8 that the time for the government to answer the complaint is EXTENDED to 12/15/2009, and the status conference is reset to 3/29/2010, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A joint status report is to be filed 14 days prior to the hearing. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
