Davenport v. Lee et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Davenport
Defendant: Ben Lee, Reddy, Dunlap, Torruella and Bal
Case Number: 2:2009cv03091
Filed: November 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER denying 99 Motion to Vacate the Judgment signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 6/17/14. (Kastilahn, A)
January 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/30/14 ORDERING that the court takes no action on 97 Motion as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.(Dillon, M)
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/26/13 ORDERING plaintiff's motion for relief from the judgment (ECF No. 91 ) is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
August 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/16/12 denying plaintiff's motions 81 , 83 , 84 . (Plummer, M)
July 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 79 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/24/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
June 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER denying 69 Motion for reconsideration signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/27/12. (Kaminski, H)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/25/2012 ORDERING Plaintiff's 72 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED; Plaintiff's 71 Request for Leave to Proceed IFP is DENIED as unnecessary. (Waggoner, D)
June 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/21/12 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion or a statement of no opposition. (Plummer, M)
March 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/27/2012 ADOPTING 62 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. This action proceeds on plaintiffs claim against Defendant Sahota. Defendants Ben Lee, Reddy, Torruella, Bal and Dunlap TERMINATED. (Michel, G)
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/7/2012 RECOMMENDING that defendants' 45 motion for summary judgment be granted; and this action proceed on plaintiff's claim against defendant Sahota. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
July 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/5/11, RECOMMENDING that defendant Sahota be dismissed without prejudice. Matter referred to Judge Burrell. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
May 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/31/11 STRIKING 24 Request for Production of Documents, DENYING 34 , 35 , 36 , and 22 MOTIONS to Compel and DENYING 37 Motion. (Meuleman, A)
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/5/11 ORDERING the Clerk shall mail Plaintiff one form USM-285 and a copy of the 7/13/10 Amended Complaint. Within 60 days from the date this order is served, Plaintiff may submit the attached No tice of Submission of Documents with a completed form USM-285 providing new instructions for service of process upon defendant Sahota and two copies of the 7/13/10 Amended Complaint. Failure to provide new instructions for service of process upon defendant Sahota within the time allowed or show good cause for such failure will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed as to that defendant.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/30/11 ORDERING that 23 Order to Show Cause, is DISCHARGED. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. (cc USM)(Dillon, M)
March 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/2011 ORDERING that USM shall not proceed with personal service on defendants Lee, Reddy, Bal and Torruella; defendants Lee, Reddy, Bal and Torruella shall SHOW CAUSE w/i 14 days, why they should not be sanctioned for failing to timely return waivers of service; Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on USM. (cc: USM)(Waggoner, D)
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/23/10, ORDERING the agency that has custody of pltf to withdraw monthly pymts from pltf's trust acct and fwd them to the Clerk's Office until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of pltf's ifp appl upon the Dir of CDCR, and serve the court's financial dept w/a copy of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davenport v. Lee et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Davenport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dunlap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Torruella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?