Cases 1 - 10 of 1,933
Sardon v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv02565
Defendant:
C Osborne, K Yocum, Chad Jennings and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Sardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Darnell Dunlap
as 24-2055
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: DARNELL DUNLAP
Antoine Bowman v. Raphael Washington, et al
as 24-2037
Defendant:
RAPHAEL WASHINGTON, Wayne County Sheriff, FREDRYN ALLEN, Wayne County Jail Commander and ROBERT DUNLAP, Wayne County Chief of Jails
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE BOWMAN
Shorts et al v. St. Charles Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02759
Defendant:
Lauren Lemmon, Christopher Waguespack, Allan Tobora and others
Plaintiff:
Rodric Juavon Shorts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Stone-Dunlap v. Trent Allen
as 24-3130
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN, Warden
SYMMES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2024cv01004
Defendant:
MICHAEL PARSONS, RONNIE A. LOCKLEAR, FEMALE REVELS and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Perkins
as 24-20521
Defendant:
Samuel Serrett, Shane Michael Dunlap, City of Baytown and others
Plaintiff:
Kedric Crawford
Eric Stone-Dunlap v. Trent Allen
as 24-3108
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN, Warden
Ameris Bank v. LDI Energy Services, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv02484
Defendant:
LDI Energy Services, LLC a North Dakota limited liability company doing business as LDI Excavation and Lucas Dunlap
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dunlap #124173 v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv03068
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Unknown Pong and Siji Thomas
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
