Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dunlap v. Minnesota Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv02216
Petitioner:
Troy Anthony Dunlap
Respondent:
Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02198
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schrader, Charles Ballard, Jessica Lawson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv02165
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Abascal et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv01812
Plaintiff:
Paul Johnson, Rossel Ulloa, Gary Duke and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Jackson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02233
Plaintiff:
Michael Franz, Jason Mendez, Thad Tanaka and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Lane et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02235
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson, Lucius Sykes, Derek Bradham and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Adler et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02124
Plaintiff:
Patrick Turner, Breyten Brown, Thelma Coleman and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Galford et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02023
Plaintiff:
Ernest Cole, Christopher Fowler, Kevin Walsh and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunlap et al v. Soo Line Railroad Company
as 0:2008cv06301
Plaintiff:
Marvin Dunlap, Marvin Dunlap, John Scanlan and others
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Acton et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv03826
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Acton, Wilbur Acton, Maurice Allen and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
