Svelund v. Sisto et al (PC)
John D. Svelund |
D. K. Sisto and Arnold Schwarzenegger |
2:2009cv03259 |
November 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
John F. Moulds |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/3/2010 ORDERING that a district judge be assigned to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 01/14/09 ordering the 11/23/09 petition is dismissed. Within 30 days from the date of this order, petitioner shall complete the attached Notice of Amendment and submit it along with the amended complaint to the court. Upon submission of the amended complaint, the court will review petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed 12/18/09. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/10/09 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.