Cheung v. Sisto
Petitioner: Frank Cheung
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Case Number: 2:2009cv03535
Filed: December 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/18/11 ordering that this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
July 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/5/2011 ORDERING that respondent shall notify this court, within ten days, whether he has any objection to the dismissal of this action. Should respondents fail to respond, petitioner's 20 request will be granted. (Duong, D)
June 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/2/2011 RECOMMENDING that ptnr's 1 application for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
February 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/16/2010 ORDERING that petitioner's 7 application to proceed IFP is GRANTED; petitioner's 6 motion for an extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary; respondent to file a response to th e petition w/in 60 days; reply due w/in 30 days of answer; if response is a motion, opposition or statement of non-opposition due w/in 30 days of motion, reply due w/in 15 days thereafter; and the clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
December 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/30/09 ORDERING petitioner to submit w/in 30 days an affidavit in support of his request to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee, failure to comply will result in a recommendation for dismissal of this action; the clerk to send petitioner an ifp form.(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cheung v. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Frank Cheung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?