Dixon v. Yates
| James Yates |
| Frank Dixon |
| 2:2010cv00631 |
| March 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/11/16 denying 87 Motion for bail pending disposition of the petition. Petitioner may renew his motions should the district judge adopt the 3/28/16 findings and recommendations. The 05/04/16 hearing on the motion is vacated. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
86
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/25/16 recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be granted. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/28/2015 DIRECTING the Clerk to strike 83 petitioner's brief filed on 9/29/2015 from the record. Petitioner shall, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday 10/30/2015, correct the record by filing his reply brief dated 9/29/2015. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
64
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/22/15 regarding the discovery of trial attorney file materials. (See order for further details)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/4/2015 GRANTING in part petitioner's 56 application for issuance of subpoenas and the Clerk shall provide petitioner's counsel with four signed but otherwise blank subpoena forms. (4 issued subpoeas served by mail on petitioner's counsel.) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/3/2015 ORDERING the custodian to produce Frank Dixon T-33888, to testify in USDC at 9:00 A.M. on August 3, 2015 in courtroom 26, before Magistrat e Judge Allison Claire; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and the Clerk to serve a copy of this order and writ on the CMF Litigation Coordinator. (cc: OTCD-SAC) (3 Certified copies served on CMF Warden, and 1 copy served on Lit Coordinator.) (Yin, K) Modified on 6/3/2015 (Yin, K).
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/24/2014 ORDERING a Status Conference set for 2/4/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/10/14 GRANTING petitioner's 47 motion for appointment of counsel; Eric Multhaup is APPOINTED to represent petitioner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; petitioner has a 30 day extension of the time previously set for the filing of a reply to the answer. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/25/14 ordering respondent is directed to file an answer to petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of the answer. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/10/2014. The previously-issued 20 Findings and Recommendations are VACATED and respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
35
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/07/14 recommending that the previously issued findings and recommendations 20 be vacated; and the motion to dismiss 8 be denied. Motion 8 and 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/22/11 ORDERING the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY close this case. The parties are directed to file status reports within 14 days after a decision in Lee is rendered. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/7/2011 ORDERING that a district judge be randomly assigned to this case; and RECOMMENDING that respondent's 8 motion to dismiss be granted; and the clerk be directed to close the case. Assigned and Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/30/2010 GRANTING counsel's 17 request and ptnr's counsel may appear by telephone at hearing set for 9/1/10 at 10:00 AM.. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dixon v. Yates | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Frank Dixon | |
| Represented By: | Eric S Multhaup |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James Yates | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
