Burt v. Swingle, et al
Antwan Burt |
Swingle and Moreno |
2:2010cv00942 |
April 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
John F. Moulds |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 17 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. 33 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/5/11. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/25/2011 ORDERING that dfts' 21 motion for denial or continuance of pltf's motion for summary judgment is DENIED ; and pltf's 26 motion for a protective order is DENIED. (Yin, K) |
Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Antwan Burt signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/11/2010. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 04/22/10 ORDERING that the pltf submit an IFP application or the appropriate filing fee within 30 days; the Clerk is directed to send pltf an IFP form. (Manzer, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.