Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ragusa et al v. United States Of America
as 0:2026cv61799
Plaintiff:
Hector Jose Ragusa and Natalie Osorio Moreno
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05065
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01149
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03520
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01927
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01929
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Moreno v. Zions Bancorporation
as 2:2026cv01911
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Moreno
Defendant:
Zions Bancorporation N.A. doing business as Nevada State Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Pabon Moreno v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2026cv05311
Plaintiff:
Marielyvette Pabon Moreno
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moreno v. Nizer, et al
as 26-1241
Plaintiff:
ROSALYN ELIANA MORENO
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. NIZER, SHAFIQ RAHMAN, NATALIE EVANS HARRIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02025
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
