Bazley v. Gates et al
| Michael Bazley |
| M Gates, A Traquino, N Aluilera, J Walker and Clark J. Kelso |
| 2:2010cv01343 |
| June 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/7/2012 ORDERING 36 Motion to Compel is DENIED; 38 Motion to Compel is DENIED; RECOMMENDING 47 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT be granted; that judgment be ente red in favor of defendant; and that Clerk be directed to close this case. 47 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT and 11 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; objections may be filed within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/29/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 9/1/11 54 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's 11/2/11 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 17 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
54
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/1/11 Recommending that Plaintiff's 11/2/10 MOTION for Summary Judgment 17 be denied. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Within fourteen days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/15/11 ordering denying 24 Motion to have defendants responsive pleading stricken from the record. Plaintiff's declaration and opposition to defendants answer 26 , 27 is disregarded. Plaintiff's 01/04/11 request for production of documents 25 is stricken and the clerk of the court shall make a notation on the docket to that effect. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/07/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/14/10 DENYING as moot 12 Motion for expedited review. Service is appropriate for defendants Walker, Traquino, Aluilera and Saukhla. The Clerk shall send plaintiff 4 USM-285 forms, 1 summons and instruction sheet and one copy of the 08/24/10 amended complaint. Within 30 days from service of this order plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit it to the court with the completed summons and USM-285 forms and 5 copies of the endorsed 08/24/10 amended complaint. Upon receipt of the documents, the court will direct the US Marshal to serve defendants, Walker, Traquino, Aluilera and Saukhla. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Michael Bazley signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/12/10. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
