Cases 1 - 10 of 750
Penton v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-7688
Defendant:
J. R. BRADFORD, I. O'BRIAN, LYNCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PENTON
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02498
Plaintiff:
Melinda J. Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Siler et al
as 5:2024ct03267
Defendant:
Captain Nicholason, R. Wiggins, Patricia Alston and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Joel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. MOHNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00299
Defendant:
LT. J. WALKER, CAPTAIN WEILAND, DEPUTY GUSTAFSON and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. RICHARDS et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Defendant:
C.O. J. RICHARDS and LT. J. WALKER
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Tanner et al
as 5:2024cv00490
Defendant:
Antonia Tanner, Angelina Tanner, Bella Tanner and others
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Penton v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-5141
Defendant:
P. CRAIG, J. R. BRADFORD, S. HUBARD and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PENTON
Omar Reynoso v. J. Anaya et al
as 2:2024cv07041
Defendant:
M.L., J. Walker, Ms. Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Jonassen, et al v. Bop, et al
as 24-2139
Defendant:
L.T. MR. HILL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. MR. REYNOLDS and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Defendant:
DEPUTY I. GUSTAFSON, LT. J. WALKER, MANUFACTURE FOR ORANGE CROCKS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FIGUEROA, ROBERT SIMMONS, CHRISTOPHER CONWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.