Aranda v. Meyers, et al
Fernando Aranda |
Elizabeth Meyers, Ellis, Bishop, - Saetern, Thomas, Roberts, Lindey, Pogue, Ramm and - Wilkinson |
2:2010cv01434 |
June 11, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Dale A. Drozd |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/2/10: Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 18, 2010 is affirmed. Upon reconsideration, the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge filed July 6, 2010 are affirmed. Plaintiff's August 20, 2010 motion to appeal is denied 15 . Plaintiff's August 20, 2010 application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied 16 . (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/2/10 RECOMMENDING that 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS be granted to the extent that plaintiff has requested that this action be voluntarily dismissed; Plaintiffs 1 complaint be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice to him refiling his complaint within the applicable statute of limitations period; and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/17/2010 DENYING pltf's 2 application to proceed IFP; pltf to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full w/in 30 days or this action will be dismissed w/out prejudice. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.