Bontemps v. Salinas et al
Gregory C. Bontemps |
Salinas, Chief Medical Officer, S. Craw, G. Niles, C. Fallaz, T. Lieberg, Long, Newman, Bodenhammer, - Russel, - Zuniga, Wong and - Manning |
2:2010cv02345 |
August 31, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
San Joaquin |
Dale A. Drozd |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/23/13 recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss 36 be granted. Defendant Martinez also be dismissed without prejudice and this action be closed. MOTION to DISMISS 36 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/14/13 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING 34 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/2013. Defendants' 24 26 Motions to Revoke plaintiff In Forma Pauperis status are DENIED. Defendants directed to file an Answer in action within 21 days. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 34 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/4/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants motions to revoke plaintiffs IFP status 24 and 26 be denied; and Defendants be directed to file an answer in this action within 21 days. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/21/12 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to re-file plaintiff's second amended complaint 17 in a newly randomly assigned action and strike the caption of that document the case numb er listed by plaintiff. (New case number 2:12-cv-2185 GGH P) The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of his complaint bearing the amended caption and the case number assigned to his new action as well as any new case documents and the order regarding consent and request for reassignment. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/29/2011 ORDERING that pltf's amended cmplt is DISMISSED; pltf has 30 days to file a second amended cmplt; and the clerk to send pltf a form for filing a civil rights action.(Yin, K) |
Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Gregory C. Bontemps signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/08/10. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/8/10 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; Plaintiff shall submit, within 28 days from the date of this ord er, a properly completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.