Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Langlan v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 2:2026cv03805
Plaintiff:
Debra Langlan
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
(PS) Gordon v. Long et al
as 2:2026cv02233
Plaintiff:
Linwood Hosea Gordon
Defendant:
Spencer David Long and American-Amicable Life Insurance Company of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Gaudarrama et al
as 3:2026cv00994
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Gaudarrama, Ortega, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Topa Insurance Company v. Nguyen et al
as 4:2026cv04979
Plaintiff:
Topa Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hong Thi Nguyen, Long Huynh and Elaine Bobigian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
SALOMON v. LONG HAUL, LLC
as 1:2026cv24338
Plaintiff:
JUAN SALOMON
Defendant:
LONG HAUL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Long v. Advanced Beauty, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv07256
Plaintiff:
Antonique Long
Defendant:
Advanced Beauty, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. Berger et al
as 1:2026cv01103
Plaintiff:
Keith J Brooks
Defendant:
Berger, Attorney Thillman, WI Attorney General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Emiola v. 3M Long Term Disability Program
as 2:2026cv06713
Plaintiff:
Yemisi Emiola
Defendant:
3M Long Term Disability Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
